Improve efficiency of MatchActively

Trade hold duration check made sense, but back when we were fetching inventories ourselves. Now, it's much better to find match first, as we have the full data loaded, and only if match is found, check user next.
This commit is contained in:
Łukasz Domeradzki
2025-07-17 13:40:35 +02:00
parent 4def44ed1e
commit a0401a3962

View File

@@ -1276,20 +1276,7 @@ internal sealed class RemoteCommunication : IAsyncDisposable, IDisposable {
Bot.ArchiLogger.LogGenericTrace($"{listedUser.SteamID}...");
byte? tradeHoldDuration = await Bot.ArchiWebHandler.GetCombinedTradeHoldDurationAgainstUser(listedUser.SteamID, listedUser.TradeToken).ConfigureAwait(false);
switch (tradeHoldDuration) {
case null:
Bot.ArchiLogger.LogGenericTrace(Strings.FormatErrorIsEmpty(nameof(tradeHoldDuration)));
continue;
case > 0 when (tradeHoldDuration.Value > maxTradeHoldDuration) || (tradeHoldDuration.Value > listedUser.MaxTradeHoldDuration):
Bot.ArchiLogger.LogGenericTrace($"{tradeHoldDuration.Value} > {maxTradeHoldDuration} || {listedUser.MaxTradeHoldDuration}");
continue;
}
HashSet<Asset> theirInventory = listedUser.Assets.Where(item => (!listedUser.MatchEverything || item.Tradable) && wantedSets.Contains((item.RealAppID, item.Type, item.Rarity)) && ((tradeHoldDuration.Value == 0) || !(item.Type is EAssetType.FoilTradingCard or EAssetType.TradingCard && CardsFarmer.SalesBlacklist.Contains(item.RealAppID)))).Select(static asset => asset.ToAsset()).ToHashSet();
HashSet<Asset> theirInventory = listedUser.Assets.Where(item => (!listedUser.MatchEverything || item.Tradable) && wantedSets.Contains((item.RealAppID, item.Type, item.Rarity))).Select(static asset => asset.ToAsset()).ToHashSet();
if (theirInventory.Count == 0) {
continue;
@@ -1297,6 +1284,8 @@ internal sealed class RemoteCommunication : IAsyncDisposable, IDisposable {
skippedSetsThisUser.Clear();
byte? tradeHoldDuration = null;
Dictionary<(uint RealAppID, EAssetType Type, EAssetRarity Rarity), Dictionary<ulong, uint>> theirTradableState = MatchingUtilities.GetTradableInventoryState(theirInventory);
for (byte i = 0; i < Trading.MaxTradesPerAccount; i++) {
@@ -1335,6 +1324,10 @@ internal sealed class RemoteCommunication : IAsyncDisposable, IDisposable {
match = false;
foreach ((ulong ourItem, uint ourFullAmount) in ourFullSet.Where(static item => item.Value > 1).OrderByDescending(static item => item.Value)) {
if ((tradeHoldDuration > maxTradeHoldDuration) || (tradeHoldDuration > listedUser.MaxTradeHoldDuration)) {
break;
}
if (!ourTradableSet.TryGetValue(ourItem, out uint ourTradableAmount) || (ourTradableAmount == 0)) {
continue;
}
@@ -1378,6 +1371,29 @@ internal sealed class RemoteCommunication : IAsyncDisposable, IDisposable {
}
}
// Now that we have a match, check trade hold to ensure user is valid to match against
// Since it involves remote call, we didn't do it previously, to skip checking against users with no matches for us
if (tradeHoldDuration == null) {
tradeHoldDuration = await Bot.ArchiWebHandler.GetCombinedTradeHoldDurationAgainstUser(listedUser.SteamID, listedUser.TradeToken).ConfigureAwait(false);
if (tradeHoldDuration == null) {
Bot.ArchiLogger.LogGenericTrace(Strings.FormatErrorIsEmpty(nameof(tradeHoldDuration)));
break;
}
if ((tradeHoldDuration.Value > maxTradeHoldDuration) || (tradeHoldDuration.Value > listedUser.MaxTradeHoldDuration)) {
Bot.ArchiLogger.LogGenericTrace($"{tradeHoldDuration.Value} > {maxTradeHoldDuration} || {listedUser.MaxTradeHoldDuration}");
break;
}
}
if ((tradeHoldDuration.Value > 0) && set.Type is EAssetType.FoilTradingCard or EAssetType.TradingCard && CardsFarmer.SalesBlacklist.Contains(set.RealAppID)) {
// We're not considering this set for matching due to trade hold
continue;
}
// Skip this set from the remaining of this round
skippedSetsThisTrade.Add(set);